Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) Display test

您所在的位置:网站首页 vivo x60屏幕如何 Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) Display test

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) Display test

2024-07-13 07:23| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

We put the Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

6.56 inches AMOLED Dimensions: 158.58 x 73.24  x 7.59 mm Resolution: 2376 x 1080 pixels, (~398 ppi density) Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) 126 display Readability 130

164

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164) Color 143

165

Google Pixel 8 Best: Google Pixel 8 (165) Video 111

163

Samsung Galaxy S23 Best: Samsung Galaxy S23 (163) Touch 117

164

Google Pixel 7 Pro Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164) Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores. DISPLAY Position in Global Ranking 89th 1. Honor Magic6 Pro 157 2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 155 3. Google Pixel 8 Pro 154 3. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos) 154 3. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) 154 6. Google Pixel 8 153 6. Vivo X100 Pro 153 8. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 151 8. Apple iPhone 15 Pro 151 8. Honor Magic V2 151 8. Honor Magic5 Pro 151 8. Honor 200 Pro 151 13. Samsung Galaxy S23 149 14. Google Pixel 7 Pro 148 14. Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ 148 14. Huawei Mate 60 Pro 148 14. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 148 18. Honor 200 147 18. Samsung Galaxy S23+ 147 18. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 147 21. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 146 21. Apple iPhone 14 Pro 146 23. Google Pixel Fold 145 23. Vivo X Fold3 Pro 145 25. Oppo Find X7 Ultra 144 25. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 144 27. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra 143 27. Huawei P60 Pro 143 27. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 143 30. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 142 30. Oppo Find N2 Flip 142 30. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 142 33. Apple iPhone 13 Pro 141 34. Apple iPhone 15 Plus 140 34. Apple iPhone 15 140 34. Honor 90 140 34. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE 140 38. Apple iPhone 14 Plus 138 38. Apple iPhone 14 138 38. Honor Magic4 Ultimate 138 38. Oppo Find X6 Pro 138 42. OnePlus Open 137 42. Oppo Find X5 Pro 137 42. Vivo X Fold 137 42. Xiaomi 14 137 46. Google Pixel 7 136 46. Honor Magic Vs 136 48. Apple iPhone 13 135 48. Google Pixel 7a 135 48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) 135 48. Vivo X90 Pro+ 135 48. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G 135 53. Huawei P50 Pro 134 53. Nothing Phone (2) 134 53. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) 134 56. Huawei Mate 50 Pro 133 56. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 133 56. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) 133 56. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon) 133 56. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek) 133 61. Asus ROG Phone 7 132 61. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos) 132 61. Vivo X90 Pro 132 61. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 132 61. Xiaomi 13 132 66. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos) 131 66. Sony Xperia 5 IV 131 66. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) 131 66. Xiaomi 13 Pro 131 70. Apple iPhone 13 mini 130 70. Google Pixel 6 Pro 130 70. Honor Magic4 Pro 130 70. Oppo Find X5 130 70. Realme GT 2 Pro 130 70. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 130 70. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) 130 70. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon) 130 70. Vivo X70 Pro+ 130 70. Xiaomi 13 Ultra 130 70. Xiaomi 12T 130 81. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 129 81. Xiaomi 13T Pro 129 81. Xiaomi 13T 129 84. Oppo Find N2 128 85. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max 127 85. Asus ROG Phone 6 127 85. Sony Xperia 5 V 127 85. Xiaomi 12T Pro 127 89. Asus Zenfone 10 126 89. Oppo Find X6 126 89. Sony Xperia 1 IV 126 89. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) 126 93. Google Pixel 6a 125 93. Google Pixel 6 125 93. Honor 70 125 93. Oppo Find X3 Pro 125 93. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 125 93. Xiaomi Mi 11 125 93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra 125 100. Apple iPhone 12 Pro 124 100. OnePlus 11 124 100. OnePlus 10 Pro 124 100. OnePlus 9 Pro 124 100. Oppo Reno8 5G 124 105. Motorola Edge 30 Pro 123 105. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G 123 105. Oppo Find X3 Neo 123 105. Xiaomi 12 Pro 123 109. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 122 109. Motorola Edge 40 Pro 122 109. Nothing Phone(1) 122 112. Apple iPhone 12 121 113. Apple iPhone SE (2022) 120 113. Realme GT 5G 120 115. Fairphone 5 119 115. Xiaomi 12 119 117. Asus Zenfone 8 115 117. Oppo Reno6 5G 115 119. Realme GT Neo 2 5G 114 119. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 114 121. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 113 121. Oppo Find X5 Lite 113 123. POCO F4 GT 111 124. Crosscall Stellar-X5 109 125. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 108 126. Sony Xperia 10 V 105 127. Sony Xperia 10 IV 104 128. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 103 129. Black Shark 5 Pro 100 130. Vivo X80 Lite 5G 99 131. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 82 DISPLAY Position in Premium Ranking 17th 1. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) 154 2. Google Pixel 8 153 3. Samsung Galaxy S23 149 4. Apple iPhone 15 140 5. Apple iPhone 14 138 6. Xiaomi 14 137 7. Apple iPhone 13 135 8. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon) 133 9. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos) 132 9. Xiaomi 13 132 11. Apple iPhone 13 mini 130 11. Realme GT 2 Pro 130 11. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon) 130 14. Xiaomi 13T Pro 129 14. Xiaomi 13T 129 16. Xiaomi 12T Pro 127 17. Asus Zenfone 10 126 17. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) 126 19. Xiaomi Mi 11 125 20. OnePlus 11 124 21. Motorola Edge 30 Pro 123 21. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G 123 21. Oppo Find X3 Neo 123 24. Apple iPhone 12 121 25. Fairphone 5 119 25. Xiaomi 12 119 27. Asus Zenfone 8 115 28. Black Shark 5 Pro 100 Pros Accurate color rendering in most tested conditions Smooth touch while gaming and browsing the web Smooth adaptations to changing lighting environments Gamut adaptation to displayed content Cons Lack of brightness in most tested conditions Lack of video brightness and contrast when watching HDR10 content Perceivable flicker

The Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) smoothly adapts to changing light conditions and has accurate color rendering. However, it lacks brightness in most tested conditions, and this has an impact on the user experience, especially when watching HDR10 videos, which lack contrast and appear somewhat flat. Dark tones are missing and a green cast is noticeable. The device has a smooth feel when browsing the web and when gaming. Although the screen reacts accurately when gaming, touch reactivity in the corners is poor, and aliasing is visible.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability 130

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

164

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra i How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability Luminance under various lighting conditions Contrast under various lighting conditions Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment From left: Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon), Vivo X60 Pro+, OnePlus 9 Pro, Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Photos for illustration only) Readability in an outdoor (20 000 lux) environment From left: Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon), Vivo X60 Pro+, OnePlus 9 Pro, Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement

This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display. Color 143

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

165

Google Pixel 8 Google Pixel 8 i How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux Color rendering indoors (1000 lux) Clockwise from top left: Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon), Vivo X60 Pro+, Motorola Edge 20 Pro, OnePlus 9 Pro (Photos for illustration only) Color fidelity measurements Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon), color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon), color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes. Color behavior on angle This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable. Video 111

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

163

Samsung Galaxy S23 Samsung Galaxy S23 i How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video

 

Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment Clockwise from top left: Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon), Vivo X60 Pro+, Motorola Edge 20 Pro, OnePlus 9 Pro (Photos for illustration only) Gamut coverage for video content HDR10 Gamut coverage SDR Gamut coverage The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

 

Motion

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

i How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion Video frame drops 30 fps content 60 fps content (Photos for illustration only) These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern). Touch 117

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

164

Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Pixel 7 Pro i How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch Average Touch Response Time Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) 94 ms Fast Good Bad Slow This response time test precisely evaluates the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

i How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion Average Reflectance (SCI) Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) 4.8 % Low Good Bad High SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack. Reflectance (SCI) Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection. PWM Frequency Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) 240 Hz Bad Good Bad Great Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users. Temporal Light Modulation This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue. Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be safer for users. Aliasing (closeup) Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) (Photos for illustrations only)


【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3